Should the Spurs re-sign Bonner?
Bonner's ability to knock down shots and space the floor for the Spurs is a huge part of the team's offensive schemes. He is a good three-point shooter, and this season he added a drive and jump hook to his arsenal. He also occasionally drives down the lane for the most awesome dunks in NBA history. Ask the Toronto Raptors.In short, he has been a reliable role player for the Spurs especially on the offensive side of the floor. Case in point, in their latest victory over the Orlando Magic, Bonner's shooting touch was key for the Spurs.
However, he remains a defensive liability. He's too slow to be an effective defender in the paint. Also, his lack of quick lateral movement is of concern when opposing athletic big men play the Spurs. See Lamar Odom, Amar'e Stoudamire, or Pau Gasol.
Also, Bonner's numbers are down from last year. In 59 games this season, he is averaging 6.9 points and 3.3 rebounds on 45.7% shooting from the field and 39.6% from the 3-point line compared to 8.2 points and 4.8 rebounds on 49.6% field goal shooting and 44% from the 3-point area in 81 games last season. This decrease in stats could be partly because of an early season hand injury.
But his play has picked up lately, in the past four games, Bonner has averaged 9.3 points, 5.5 rebounds and 1.8 assist per game.
Nonetheless, we should be reminded he has yet to prove he can play as good or as consistent during the post season. His performance in this year's playoffs could be an important factor for the Spurs to decide whether to resign him or not. In last season's playoffs he was a non-factor against the Dallas Mavericks despite his good regular season performance.
Overall, Bonner is a great complimentary player despite his shortcomings on defense. Which leaves the question -- is Bonner the type of player the Spurs can feel comfortable going deeper into the luxury tax by re-signing?
With the Spurs are already in luxury tax territory at $79,158, 564 and next year they are at $54,135,160 in guaranteed contracts. Currently, Bonner is making $3,240,380 in his final contract year with the Spurs.
What are your thoughts? Should the Spurs re-sign Bonner or should they use some of their money on younger talents to provide more youth and athleticism on their roster or spend it on a legit big man? Send us your opinions and comments on this matter.




.png&w=244&h=193&zc=1)

the Spurs this season.
With the Lakers and Spurs finishing the season 2-2 in head-to-head matchups, once again I venture into enemy territory and speak with Lakers blogger and friend of Project Spurs, Rey Moralde, of 
outscored the Lakers bench 20-4. 4 points! Really?
Jeff
title contender?
Jeff: Rey. Take a look at this! BAM!
contender... I still do. And we both think the Lakers are still the faves... but I can't gauge them very well until the postseason starts. All right. Awesome. Here.
First Lakers' coach Phil Jackson admitted he is worried about the Spurs and now Spurs' coach Gregg Popovich reciprocates the feeling.
In yesterday's game against the Lakers, Spurs' Manu Ginobili and Lakers' Ron Artest got tangled up a bit which led to both of them receiving technicals. Of course, this didn't sit well with Phil and he had the
Los Angeles Lakers, was asked about the Spurs heading into the playoffs.




The NBA pays these players a substantial amount of money to play at their healthiest and highest level of performance. Now it is on their own will to play in the summer for their country. I am including ALL NBA players, international or U.S. I am not against supporting your country, but should they start to add stipulations to their contracts if these players go off in the summer and get hurt? These franchises put out millions of dollars on these players and if they get hurt, why should they get paid for that season if they don' play? I know it is a sticky question, and my family and I have had many conversations over this, but I just wanted to get your opinion. - Becca
pasado 24 de marzo, donde se enfrentaron a su equipo rival los Lakers de Los Angeles en el AT&T center. Para este juego Ginobili fue el mayor contribuyente anotando un total de 24 puntos mientras George Hill 21. Aunque en este juego el puntuaje de los Spurs incrementaba en cada cuarto por la primera mitad del juego, no fue hasta el tercer cuarto que los Lakers de Los Angeles decidieron tomar control logrando así derrotar a los Spurs 92 a 83.
Asombrosamente los New Jersey Nets vencieron a los Spurs la noche del lunes 29 de marzo en el IZOD Center. No cabe duda que definitivamente nos falto Manu Ginobili esta noche ya que el esencial jugador falto al juego debido a un dolor a su espalda. Roger Mason también abandono el juego durante la primera mitad debido a una torcedura al nudillo de uno de sus meñiques. El mayor contribuyente a este juego fue George Hill con 19 puntos, de ahí le siguieron Richard Jefferson con 16, y Tim Duncan con 13.