"Last night, I was watching the Spurs-Blazers game and about 8 minutes into the 1st quarter, David Aldridge said that the Spurs aren't going to re-sign Manu? If that's so we definetly should trade him. I know that he's definetly a game changer and we wouldn't have won those titles without him, but he's on a decline. We should try and trade him for Bosh or even Granger, and keep RJ because I think he would be more comfortable and we will still have the big 3! But what I'm getting at, did I seriously hear that we aren't going to re-sign Manu? Instead of him going to a possible contender next year like Boston, Cleveland, Nuggets or the feared Lakers, then we should make a trade for him if we are not going to re-sign him." - Samir Patel

Samir,

You heard right, and according to a few of our sources, this is no surprise. I can't help but think this is a mistake though. Sure, Manu's had his share of injuries, but I've said for quite some time that I think the Spurs could work out a deal to keep Manu short-term at a reduced contract.

Manu has said money isn't an issue any more so I don't understand why they couldn't offer him a reduced salary as part of a 2-year extension where the second year is a team option. Currently, Manu is making $10.7 million a year. To stay a Spur, I think Manu would take $6 million a year and I think that is a fair amount to pay him.

If they were so concerned about cutting costs, why would they ever offer Antonio McDyess a guaranteed three-year contract starting at $4.5 million a year.

Manu's stats may be down across the board, but yet he's still averaging more than Richard Jefferson in points, assists and steals in five less minutes a game. Manu also plays hard on both sides of the floor. If that sounds like a shot at Jefferson, it should. Jefferson is set to make $15 million next year, yet the Spurs can't offer $6 million to Manu, one of few Spurs who seems to have some passion and intensity left.

If they can't sign Manu, they should at least attempt to trade him for a young, athletic swingman or center. I'd rather get something instead of nothing. I do know that I'm not ready to see Manu in another jersey, but I also know Bosh and Granger are not realistic. Tyrus Thomas is more on the money of what we could expect in return.

For more on San Antonio without Manu, be sure to check out Lance Fell's article posted last week.

Got a mailbag question? Send it in to This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. or click the contact link above.

Don't be an asterisk. No we are not talking about Phil Jackson's snide remark regarding the Spurs 1999 NBA title.

Project Spurs was asked to help promote the "Don't Be An Asterisk" campaign aimed at preventing young men and women from using steroids in sports in conjunction with the upcoming Winter Olympics. Obviously, we were honored we were asked to assist in this campaign.

Some of the facts on the website about steroids were eye-opening and somber.  The effects of steroid use on the body of men and women are devastating. Also there are testimonials from the athletes competing in the upcoming Winter Olympics. Testimonials from Jennifer Rodriguez (Long Track Speed Skating) discussing steroids to Manuel Guerra, Jr. (Sledge Hockey) on his training regiment, the website is something all young athletes must visit.

Please visit the "Don't Be An Asterisk" website by clicking HERE and check out the official facebook page by clicking HERE.

Michael and Jeff went live on Friday night to recap the first two games of the Rodeo Road trip, preview tonight's game against the Clippers and go on a long-winded rant about the current state of the Spurs. You can listen to the full 2-hour show by clicking play below (mp3 file coming soon).

Thanks to News 4 WOAI's Humberto Cervera, Mr. X Sports, Dave and Peter from the No Look Pass, KWAPT and everyone else who called in and chatted with us live.

Our next live show will be on Monday for the Lakers game. We'll go live pregame and postgame and we'll be chatting throughout the game.

• KENS 5 - David Flores says that the Spurs have enough time to turn around the season
• San Antonio Express News - Mike Monroe tells us that Duncan thinks that this year's Rodeo Road Trip could be the most important one for the Spurs.
• 48 Minutes of Hell - With the trade deadline looming, Timothy Varner suggested some roster shake up for the Spurs.
• ESPN - Seth Landman gave advise to fantasy owners about four NBA All-Stars worth trading including Tim Duncan.
• Bleacher Report - Despite their recent struggles, Robert Kleeman still believes in Tim Duncan and the San Antonio Spurs. We share the same sentiment.
• Euroleague - Caja Laboral gave reported about Tiago Splitter's recent injury. Thankfully it doesn't sound so serious.
• San Antonio Express News - Mike Monroe thinks that the best may have yet to come for McDyess and the Spurs. I hope he's right!
• Hoopsworld - Luke Byrnes talked about who's hot in the NBA right now... George Hill made it to the list.
• The Sacramento Bee - Sam Amick talked about the frustrations in Sacramento after the Kings' loss to the Spurs.
• 48 Minutes of Hell - Andrew McNeill thinks that the Spurs should not rock the boat... Too much.
• KENS 5 - Dan Oshinsky gave us 8 reasons to be excited about the Spurs' Rodeo Road Trip
• San Antonio Express News - Jeff McDonald discussed about the Spurs' shooting slump. The fix? According to the Spurs, shooters just need to keep shooting.
• Bleacher Report - Hadarii Jones gave us a list of 10 NBA Players that needs to be returned to their senders. Guess who's on the list?
• KENS 5 - Dan Oshinsky takes a closer look at LatinD's own Rodeo Road Trip to the United States. Great read. Best of luck David! Have a safe trip!

• Jordan Rivas talked about one of the NBA's best big men of all time in his latest "Then and Now" series.
• Which do you prefer the finger roll or the tear drop? Jeff Garcia talked about the effectiveness of both Spur moves.
• Looking ahead at this year's Rodeo Road Trip. Will the Spurs be able to turn the corner during their trip? Tell us what you think.
• Lance Fell wonders about a world without Manu. Fans have some interesting thoughts at the comment section, share us your thoughts.
• Michael De Leon and Jeff Garcia reviewed the Spurs at midpoint and were joined by special guest Humberto Cervera of San Antonio's News 4 WOAI in their latest Spurscast. A MUST LISTEN for all Spurs fans. Humberto gave the inside info on the Spurs, Coach Pop, and a reason Ian Mahinmi has underachieved.
  
• Assessing the McDyess and Bogans signings, are they playing up to expectations?
• And Michael De Leon had a Q&A about the Spurs-Blazers game with Sophia Brugato of Bust a Bucket.

Make sure to visit us daily as we are doing our best to provide you great contents and updates about the San Antonio Spurs. Enjoy the weekend!

The Spurs are 1-1 so far on the Rodeo Road Trip. Squeaking out a win against the Kings and losing a close one to the Blazers.  Oh and this happened! Guess the Kings scouting crew forgot Manu likes to go left.

For tonight's game against the Portland Trailblazers, I collaborated with Sophia Brugato of another Bloguin blog, Bust a Bucket. We've had Matt from Bust a Bucket on the Spurscast before to preview a game, so it made sense to go back to them for tonight's Q&A. Here are Sophia's answers to my questions:

1. With Oden and Przybilla injured for the year, what will Portland have to do to keep Tim Duncan from taking over the game?

Keep the ball out of his hands. LaMarcus, Batum and to some degree Pendergraph will have to work together to cover him. I assume mostly Batum and Aldridge will have much of the "guard Timmy" assignment.

2. Who is the Blazers' go-to man without Brandon Roy?

Anyone. It literally changes every night. I think tonight , the Blazers will need Bayless to attack inside over and over again and LaMarcus to have a phenominal offensive showing in order to win.

3. The Blazers have beat the Spurs without some of their best players before. What do they have to do to do it again and sweep the season series?

See above :)

4. Andre Miller went off for 52 points but then went 3 of 13 against the Jazz. Which Andre will we see tonight?

Who knows, it all is a matter of matchups. Against the Jazz he had some not-so-favorable matchups (guarded by Williams etc.) The point is, Miller can score, just depends on his teammates, Nates lineups and the opposing guards .

5. What are your thoughts on the Blazers now that we are past midseason. Have they lived up to your expectations?

I have no expectations . That pretty much sums up my feelings as a fan this season.

6. Prediction time. Who wins, by what score and why?

Blazers by 6 because they are tired and will speed up the pace, allowing the Spurs runs that will keep score close but eventually come away with the win.

Make sure to visit Bust a Bucket for my answers to Sophia's questions and for some great Blazers coverage.

With most attention being given to the Spurs' continued struggles and Richard Jefferson's underwhelming performance this season, it's good to give emphasis on the Spurs' other offseason additions that play important roles in the Spurs' rotation. Namely Antonio McDyess and Keith Bogans.

While their signings was not as hyped as getting Richard Jefferson or drafting DeJuan Blair, they might be the additional pieces needed by the Spurs for a successful title run this season.

Let us start with Antonio McDyess. Bringing in McDyess helped fill the void left by Kurt Thomas and Fabricio Oberto. He is a solid veteran perceived as a player who can complement Duncan's game.

He has proven in the past that he can hit the mid-range jumper with consistency and can help out in getting rebounds. He is just what Duncan needed by his side in the paint.

But McDyess struggled early on with the Spurs and people started to wonder just how much he has left. For the season, he is averaging 6.2 points and 5.5 rebounds in 21 minutes of action. A far cry compared to his season average of 9.6 points and 9.8 rebounds just a year ago with the Pistons.

While his slow start could be attributed to the fact he is still learning and trying fit in to an entirely new system in San Antonio, he is also known for being a slow starter and usually find his rhythm during the second half of the season.

Unsurprisingly, he has been playing solid basketball as of late averaging 12.2 points and 5.4 rebounds in his last five outings while shooting 63% from the field. That is a welcome development for a Spurs team that needs more inside presence, toughness, court savvy and energy on the floor.

Whether McDyess' resurgence is a start of good things to come only time will tell. But if he continues to sustain his improved play throughout the season, the Spurs' front office will look like geniuses once again.

That brings us to Keith Bogans. We called the Bogans' signing an “under-the-radar” move because unlike Jefferson or McDyess, he was not big name acquisition. But with the departure of Bruce Bowen, getting Bogans was a no-brainer because he can provide much needed defense on the perimeter and can shoot the 3 at a fairly decent rate -- 35% for his career and 38% this season.

Don’t get me wrong, Bogans can’t replace Bruce. But he hustles and is a tough defender. I actually see him as poor man's version Bruce Bowen.

His numbers will not "wow" you either. He is averaging only 4.9 points, 2.8 rebounds and 1.3 assist in 20 minutes of playing time. Although his 42.3% shooting from the field is a career high.

However, Bogans has been more aggressive lately and his production have shown some improvements. He averaged 5.3 points, 1.8 rebounds and 1.5 assists on 53.3% shooting from the floor in the team's last five games.

But the Spurs they don’t expect much scoring from Bogans. Instead they need him to be a steady presence on the defensive end of the floor and any points he gives could be considered a bonus.

More than just numbers, the most important thing for both McDyess and Bogans is to continue to get comfortable with their roles and gain more confidence as the season goes on. Their veteran smarts will come in handy for the Spurs in the playoffs.

And although it could be said that McDyess and Bogans have been under-performing, there are encouraging signs. McDyess is starting to find his spots and while Bogans is not producing much on offense, his perimeter defense is arguably helping to the Spurs’ cause.

What do you guys think? Are they playing out as expected or are they turning out to be major disappointments? Send us your thoughts and opinions on this matter.

On this episode of the Spurscast, Michael and Jeff were joined by special guest Humberto Cervera of News 4 WOAI.

We looked at the Spurs at midseason, reviewed all positions along with the bench and coach, previewed the rodeo road trip and made our predictions for the second half of the season.

Humbie also gave us an insider's look at the Spurs, talked about Pop's early frustration and had a surprising prediction for the second half of this season.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Download

SPOIL:

"4 a : to impair the disposition or character of by overindulgence or excessive praise b : to pamper excessively : coddle"

How, exactly, does a person become spoiled? When I began approaching the question of are Spurs fans being spoiled, I began contemplating the meaning of the condition. I started considering how it starts in someone.

Does having too much of something spoil someone? There are people who have large sums of money that are extremely generous and use their wealth to benefit others. So is having too much of a good thing really enough, by itself, to spoil someone?

Perhaps having too much of something without earning it causes someone to be spoiled. There are, however, those who have unexpectedly come into money or influence suddenly, and they express tremendous gratitude and also seek to help others. So it would seem someone can't become spoiled simply by having a lot of something they didn't earn.

Maybe it's having a lot of something you didn't earn for so long you forget what it was like to not have it. You expect it to be there. You expect large amounts of it to be there, all the time, even though you've never worked for it. You feel entitled to it.

Eureka.

After careful consideration, I'm confident the preceding progression would lead to most people becoming spoiled. Nevertheless, Merriam-Webster's definition – and the definition of several other major dictionaries – have clearly spelled out the exact state of being spoiled. The definition states that character has to be impaired by overindulgence or excess.

That raises an important question: can a team win too much? If excess is a necessary component in spoiling someone, is it fair to say that winning can ever exist in excess? If a team wins 75 games in a year, but their division rival wins 74, doesn't that mean the unusually high numbers of wins were all necessary? What if they had the number one seed in the conference secured at 60 wins? Were those last fifteen wins overindulgent?

If the point of the game is to score more points than the other team, doesn't that make playing to the objective of the game (winning) necessary every time? It would seem that winning cannot occur in excess within pro sports.

The definition of spoiled also states that character must be impaired. Impair suggests to damage or diminish. It's hard to make judgments about a large and diverse group of people, especially when it comes to their collective character, if such a thing even exists.

Can we honestly say that the character or disposition of Spurs fans has been diminished because the team they cheer for has won a lot of basketball games? Wouldn't that be levying a charge typically reserved for unappreciative children who spend their wealthy parents' money on frivolous entertainment in amounts that approach what the average person makes in a year? Spurs fans expect their team to perform well, but I don't think they've spiraled down as far as having actual character deficiencies as a result of win percentage.

Spurs fans are surprised. They're shocked at a level of play that is inconsistent with a decade long performance ranking among the best in professional sports. The Spurs aren't playing horribly, but they are playing sub-par, according to their own standards, and that's a distinction Spurs fans are still able to make. The Spurs are like a light that has shone so brightly over the past ten years that when they diminish in radiance, even slightly, people notice. That makes Spurs fans observant, demanding at most, but not spoiled.

The (almost) Exceptions

There are always exceptions. The fan base of a professional sports team is too large and too wide spread to be entirely free of idiots. Though I believe they are in the minority, there are people whose disposition is affected by whether the Spurs win or lose. I still don't believe they qualify as being spoiled, due to the specific criteria the word's definition requires, but their character certainly seems diminished in the wake of half a season only slightly less impressive than ones that have come before it.

How does it happen? How does someone who has nothing to do with the outcome of a game or season become so emotionally dependent on the result? I think it starts with them taking pride in their team; there's nothing wrong with that. At some point, however, that pride becomes personal pride. They believe because they route for the team that wins, that somehow elevates them personally. They feel personal pride when their teams wins, and conversely they feel some level of personal shame when their team loses. They have no effect on the outcome so their frustration is two-fold. Their feelings of personal worth are being affected by a sports team they can't directly help. These people are, obviously, unhealthy and unfortunately they also tend to be excessively vocal during a season like this one.

Most Spurs fans, aren't spoiled. The ones that are having their whole lives ruined because the Spurs aren't winning as many basketball games as they have in the past, those people are just noisier than the rest of us.